Everyone, in their own way, wants to look a certain image. That is why there are many different types of clothing companies for all sorts- low or high incomers, young or old, boring or hip, functional or aesthetic- the majority want to feel and look good in what they are wearing. It is up to the clothing company to make their advertisements sell the image the customer wants.
The clothing promotions for American Apparel market towards the “young metropolitan adults” living in urban areas. The ads have drawn much attention from the public because the images are almost blatantly pornographic. American Apparel is teetering between the world of advertising and the porn industry with the images. CEO Dov Charney wouldn’t have it any other way. He wants to make sure his clothing company is representing the younger generation and be inventive at the same time. The message the ads send out can be read exclusively for a younger crowd and disapproved by older adults. Charney is pushing a boundary continually present nowadays: sex. He has taken the idea ”sex sells” and created a whole new image. The messages are not anything less from the truth. People desire sex. People want to be viewed as good looking so another will take interest in them. A young adult who sees American Apparel advertisements and chooses to buy the clothing has decided to be desirable like the model (male or female). The clothing barely sells the image more so the attitude coming across in the ad. Below is a typical ad of American Apparel.

The ad demonstrates a sexually confident young woman looking directly at the camera with her captive look. Without the context of the ad the photo could be thought of as an image viewed on soft core porn sites, a girl’s Myspace photo, or a personal moment between two love ones. Putting the photo back into its context, the selling point becomes the models sexual attitude and not the clothing she is wearing. The image becomes desirable because it promotes sex. The idea sounds basic yet the set up of the photo is constructed to fit a specific formula that creates the affect.

Here is another with image of a girl on a table very similar to one above.
No, not all American Apparel ads display the models on glass tables inside vague apartments. But the images support that American Apparel ads are constructing ‘normalcy’. The concept can extend to the type of girls American Apparel uses for the ads as well.
Part of the sexually transgressive approach is to supposedly photograph girls from everyday. Charney wants to use the “young metropolitan adult” in his ads to attain the look of authenticity. His choice to use real girls instead of professional models (or amateur models) is counterproductive. On the one hand, Charney is appreciating women for the natural beauty they possess but exposing the naturalism to create the affects of a porn shoot or video. At least that appears to be the case when viewing ads like the photo below. The model is in a provocative pose that reveals an ideal body. 
However, even though the images are pornographic some of the images address the concept of ‘real’ models who display facial and body characteristics that young women customers can relate to. The CEO claims he wants the models to be just like the young adults “you might see walking down the street, at the local coffee shop or working behind the counter at an American Apparel store.”. The statement holds true when looking at the model in this photo:

The features of the model make her appear like a regular young women. The model’s noticable tan line, her bruised knees, even her abs appear to be less than perfect. The noticable qualities make the model more personable and relatable to the female customer. The ad sells a look that is attainable. It is difficult to see with many of American Apparel ads but American Apparel, in its own way, is trying to reinvent beauty with their advertisements.
Charney-the overseer of the ads-may possibly set up photo shoots with himself and the models that are constructed to appear very submissive. An interview with the New York Times describes Charney’s involvement with the American Apparel ads “He sometimes photographs the models himself, and when they are pictured in bed it may be in his bed or on his couch…and the photos seem to suggest that they were taken while getting it on: his bare chest and a pair of sky-blue gym shorts beneath a woman straddling him or his face partially visible on the pillow next to a happily disheveled young woman.” Here is an example:

One cannot tell if Charney is actually engaging sexually with the model or if the setup is a performace. The CEO has certainly made a reputation for himself as being so submissive that the truth would never be told. Still, the idea that the company is trying to convey a specific message that involves performances, even by Charney is curiously interesting to ponder about.
Quotes taken from the New York Times
Wolf, Jaime. “And You Thought Abercrombie & Fitch Was Pushing It?” The New York Times (2006): 1-8.
3 years ago
•
0 notes